Review responses feel free because nobody writes a check for them. There's no line item on the P&L for "time spent replying to Google reviews." But the cost is real, it's recurring, and for most businesses it's higher than they think.
A one-star review shows up on your Google Business Profile. The customer is upset, the tone is sharp, and your first instinct is either to fire back or to ignore it entirely. Both courses of action are wrong.
Most local businesses respond to negative reviews when they notice them and ignore positive ones. The logic seems reasonable: a happy customer doesn't need anything, and a complaint needs damage control.
I owned two restaurants for 10 years. Over that time we responded to plenty of reviews. Some patterns repeat so often that having a starting framework saves real time, as long as the framework gets customized for each review. A template that gets copy-pasted without changes is worse than no response at all, because it broadcasts that nobody read the review.
Every business starts with good intentions about review responses. A new review comes in, someone on the team writes a reply, and it feels manageable. Then the business gets busy. A few reviews go unanswered. Then a few more. Within a couple of months, the last response on the profile is three months old, and the five most recent reviews have no reply at all.
When someone searches "restaurant near me" or "plumber in [city]," Google returns a local pack of three businesses at the top of the results. Getting into that pack depends on several factors, and Google reviews are one of the most significant.